
It was good to see so many at the recent meeting - and good to have such a fruitful outcome to the 'business' meeting held beforehand.
It was, rightly, decided that we should have a Poetry Aloud bank account and this will have been done by the time of our next meeting. But it was not thought necessary to form a committee as we could not imagine taking major decisions - e.g. about our venue - without consulting all who attend, anyway.
It was suggested that we should have a half hour discussion before every second or third meeting so that anyone could put forward ideas about what we might do in addition to the monthly readings, or how we might move forward. We will have the first such meeting at 7.00pm before our July meeting, on Tuesday 27th.
Colin pointed out that we could use the website to float ideas beforehand so that discussions are focussed and informed.
A development that I think would be worthwhile is the formation of an email 'critical' group. The meetings are welcoming and supportive, which hopefully builds up confidence, but I would also value a forum in which a group of us could work at enhancing our skills.
One way of achieving this is to have a small group who commit to exchanging poems once a month, and commenting on what the others have sent.
It works like this:
- Each member sends the group organiser a poem at the beginning of the month
- The organiser collates the poems and sends them out, without names attached
- Each member sends the organiser a comment on each poem (except his/her own of course!) within a set period, say 2 weeks
- The organiser collates the comments and sends them out, with names attached.
So at the end of the process, which has only taken a couple of weeks, everyone gets to know who wrote each poem, and what the other members thought they might do to improve their poem.
It is important that the comments are positive in tone, but honest reactions - the aim is to help a friend make a good poem even better, whenever possible.
The system works well with 5 or 6 people in a group. If there are more the workload becomes such that one can dread the arrival of the poems rather than looking forward to it! It also helps if the members feel that they are at roughly the same point on the path towards becoming good writers.
We could, of course, have more than one group if enough of us wanted to get involved.
Comments
E-mail 'critical' group
This is what our portfolio facility was intended to do. I know when we set it up and tried it it seemed difficult to understand. Since then I believe I have corrected a technical fault that prevented the e-mails being sent out to alert people that they needed to look at the portfolio.
Perhaps we should give the site portfolio another go. I would be prepared to instruct face-to-face at a pre-meeting or at a separate time altogether if that would be useful.
--
colin
portfolio
I certainly think the portfolio by email would be less cumbersome and speedier. I already exchange poems in this way with several people on an informal basis. As I understood it the portfolio would only be accessible to people who had wished to join - no-one who was not part of the particular group could gain access. We could have any number of groups.
SPS do operate a 'snail-mail' system - and there is no reason why the Bury group couln't run this alongside an email system for those wo do not have email. From what people have said it is very slow (and of course expensive to operate). In my experience comments that don't arrive almost immediately just get sidelined. I suspect most of us finsh or abandon a poem within a few days of starting it.
There is a lot to be said for keeping the group membership down to no more than six people and everyone needs to feel completely at ease with the other members.
Cameron
i
Portfolio
I'd be glad to hear how the site portfolio now works, when we meet in July.
My gut feeling at present is still that I would prefer an email group as it is more direct, there are reminders, it is possible for all but the organiser to comment on poems without knowing who wrote them (in theory at least!), and there is a commitment to write a new poem each month.
The site is excellent but for this particular purpose I suspect an email group is more direct and efficient. If all of the features mentioned above are also possible through the site portfolio, though, I will be happy to be proved wrong!